EntryPoint IntelligenceERC-4337 on Avalanche C-Chain Data to 2026-10-25

Examples v08-erc20-paymaster-usdc-transfer

v08-erc20-paymaster-usdc-transfer

v0.8 succeeded 1 operation

Bundler 0xcc5c…2c41 submitted one v0.8 UserOperation: account 0xfabc…0b65 asked to 2 calls (erc20_approve x1, erc20_transfer x1); the op succeeded; gas sponsored by 0x8888…2402 Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.8) evidence level: primary source.

Transaction
0x9e9f348b617410956dfa19c5dfa04ffed56298744a4b9398e44f02d183f90cba explained →
Block
96,876,734
Outer status
success grade: observed
UserOperations
1 in 1 handleOps call
Selector
0x765e827f
How to read the evidence markers

Evidence levels (how strong an address label is)

  • evidence level: primary source The vendor or protocol itself publishes this exact address
  • evidence level: self-description What the contract says about itself via a getter; contracts can claim any name
  • evidence level: cluster Shares a key, getter or bytecode with labelled addresses: same machinery, not proof of the same operator
  • evidence level: hint Ranking, explorer tag, metadata or third-party label: a clue, never proof
  • evidence level: unlabelled No registry label. In running text, an address without a marker has no label.

Evidence grades (how a value was obtained), strongest first

grade: observed grade: decoded grade: recomputed grade: recovered grade: contract read grade: inferred grade: unknown

Weaker grades are set in italics. Hover or focus a marker for its definition; full definitions.

Who was involved

Bundler
0xcc5c…2c41 evidence level: unlabelled
sent and paid for the outer transaction · grade: observed
Called contract
0x4337…f108 EntryPoint v0.8 evidence level: primary source
grade: observed
EntryPoint
0x4337…f108 EntryPoint v0.8 evidence level: primary source
v0.8 handleOps · grade: decoded
Beneficiary
0xcc5c…2c41 evidence level: unlabelled
the beneficiary argument of handleOps · same address as the bundler · grade: decoded

Operations: what was asked, what happened

Operation 1

v0.8 succeeded index 0

Account 0xfabc…0b65 asked to 2 calls (erc20_approve x1, erc20_transfer x1); the op succeeded; gas sponsored by 0x8888…2402 Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.8) evidence level: primary source.

Who was involved

Smart account
0xfabc…0b65 evidence level: unlabelled
the sender field of UserOperationEvent · grade: observed
Account code
0xbb4f…cbcd evidence level: unlabelled
contract code and storage read at block 96876734 · EIP-1167 minimal proxy · grade: contract read
Paymaster
0x8888…2402 Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.8) evidence level: primary source
the operation's paymasterAndData field · grade: decoded

What was asked

Entry function on the account: executeBatch((address,uint256,bytes)[]) grade: decoded

  1. Call 1 allow 0x8888…2402 Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.8) evidence level: primary source to spend 72587 base units of token 0xb97e…8a6e USDC (native, Circle) evidence level: primary source (= 0.072587 USDC; token symbol and decimals read from the contract at block 96876734) (that address is this op's paymaster)

    target 0xb97e…8a6e USDC (native, Circle) evidence level: primary source · function approve(address,uint256) grade: decoded · via the account's executeBatch (batch) function

  2. Call 2 transfer 200000 base units of token 0xb97e…8a6e USDC (native, Circle) evidence level: primary source to 0x23d3…c890 (= 0.2 USDC; token symbol and decimals read from the contract at block 96876734)

    target 0xb97e…8a6e USDC (native, Circle) evidence level: primary source · function transfer(address,uint256) grade: decoded · via the account's executeBatch (batch) function

What happened

The outer transaction reported success grade: observed; this UserOperation succeeded grade: observed.

  • Call 1 ran (its logs show it) grade: observedan Approval from the account to this spender appears in this op's segment (allowance may since be spent)
  • Call 2 confirmed by an exactly matching log grade: observeda Transfer with exactly this token, sender, recipient and amount appears in this op's execution segment

Token movements logged during this operation:

Money for this operation

The EntryPoint charged this operation 0.001043 AVAX (actualGasCost) grade: observed, taken from paymaster deposit 0x888888888888ec68a58ab8094cc1ad20ba3d2402 Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.8) evidence level: primary source grade: inferred and paid to the beneficiary grade: inferred.

Sponsorship: ERC-20 paymaster: the user pays the paymaster in a token grade: observed

Token charged in postOp: 12633 base units of 0xb97e…8a6e USDC (native, Circle) evidence level: primary source, sent to 0xd8ba…f21c evidence level: unlabelled grade: observed. the token payment goes where the paymaster's config says; it need not be the paymaster address

Money

Outer receipt fee (bundler → chain)
0.002314 AVAX
gas used × effective gas price, paid once
Σ actualGasCost (deposits → beneficiary)
0.001043 AVAX
1 operation charge

The outer fee (what the bundler paid the network) and the per-op charges (what the EntryPoint collected from deposits and paid to the beneficiary) are different quantities. They are listed, never added together; their difference is not 'bundler profit'.

The logs

Receipt logs (6), in order, with the lifecycle phase each belongs to
#EmitterEventPhase
00x4337…f108 EntryPoint v0.8 evidence level: primary sourceBeforeExecutionboundary
10xb97e…8a6e USDC (native, Circle) evidence level: primary sourceApprovalexecution
20xb97e…8a6e USDC (native, Circle) evidence level: primary sourceTransferexecution
30xb97e…8a6e USDC (native, Circle) evidence level: primary sourceTransferexecution
40x8888…2402 Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.8) evidence level: primary sourceUserOperationSponsoredexecution
50x4337…f108 EntryPoint v0.8 evidence level: primary sourceUserOperationEventexecution

What we can't tell

  • The signer is a passkey (a P-256 public key held by a device or password manager); there is no address to look up, and the key does not tell you who holds the device.
  • A paymaster paid the gas charge, but that does not mean the user paid nothing: the paymaster may bill the user off-chain or in a token (see sponsorship mode).
  • The beneficiary is only where gas compensation was sent; it is not the user, and it is not proof of who runs the bundler.
  • UserOp success=true only means the account's call did not revert at the top level. Accounts and batch executors can catch inner failures, so individual legs can still have failed.
  • Names (token symbols, labels) are metadata unless their evidence level says otherwise.
  • The outer fee is what the bundler paid the network for the whole transaction; it cannot be split fairly across ops or legs, and comparing it with the per-op charges does not give bundler profit.

Rendered from the explain record (schema epi.explain/v1). Address labels and levels come from the current registry. How evidence grades and levels work →