v07-deploy-kernel-installmodule · EntryPoint Intelligence

Bundler 0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint submitted one v0.7 UserOperation: account 0x9d0f…e5ec asked to run its own function installModule() (account self-configuration, no outgoing call), deploying the account first; the op succeeded; gas sponsored by 0x7777…834c Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.7) evidence level: primary source.

Transaction: 0x30664e9fc53d9e93dafe726fe9b2df4f660f9686b923e41ddb3ec2bc25079977 explained →
Block: 97,878,203
Outer status: success grade: observed
UserOperations: 1 in 1 handleOps call
Selector: 0x765e827f

How to read the evidence markers

Evidence levels (how strong an address label is)

evidence level: primary source The vendor or protocol itself publishes this exact address
evidence level: self-description What the contract says about itself via a getter; contracts can claim any name
evidence level: cluster Shares a key, getter or bytecode with labelled addresses: same machinery, not proof of the same operator
evidence level: hint Ranking, explorer tag, metadata or third-party label: a clue, never proof
evidence level: unlabelled No registry label. In running text, an address without a marker has no label.

Evidence grades (how a value was obtained), strongest first

grade: observed grade: decoded grade: recomputed grade: recovered grade: contract read grade: inferred grade: unknown

Weaker grades are set in italics. Hover or focus a marker for its definition; full definitions.

Who was involved

Bundler: 0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint
sent and paid for the outer transaction · grade: observed
Called contract: 0x0000…a032 EntryPoint v0.7 evidence level: primary source
grade: observed
EntryPoint: 0x0000…a032 EntryPoint v0.7 evidence level: primary source
v0.7 handleOps · grade: decoded
Beneficiary: 0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint
the beneficiary argument of handleOps · same address as the bundler · grade: decoded

Operations: what was asked, what happened

Operation 1

v0.7 succeeded index 0

Account 0x9d0f…e5ec asked to run its own function installModule() (account self-configuration, no outgoing call), deploying the account first; the op succeeded; gas sponsored by 0x7777…834c Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.7) evidence level: primary source.

Who was involved

Smart account: 0x9d0f…e5ec evidence level: unlabelled
the sender field of UserOperationEvent · grade: observed
Account code: 0xbac8…4b4d ZeroDev Kernel v0.3.1 implementation evidence level: primary source
contract code and storage read at block 97878203 · EIP-1967 proxy · grade: contract read
Factory: 0xd703…42d5 ZeroDev Kernel meta factory / FactoryStaker (Kernel v0.3.x) evidence level: primary source
the operation's initCode field · grade: decoded
Paymaster: 0x7777…834c Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.7) evidence level: primary source
the operation's paymasterAndData field · grade: decoded

What was asked

Entry function on the account: installModule(uint256,address,bytes) grade: decoded

No calls requested (empty call data).

This operation also deployed the account grade: observed via the factory 0xd703…42d5 ZeroDev Kernel meta factory / FactoryStaker (Kernel v0.3.x) evidence level: primary source.

What happened

The outer transaction reported success grade: observed; this UserOperation succeeded grade: observed.

Money for this operation

The EntryPoint charged this operation 0.006576 AVAX (actualGasCost) grade: observed, taken from paymaster deposit 0x777777777777aec03fd955926dbf81597e66834c Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.7) evidence level: primary source grade: inferred and paid to the beneficiary grade: inferred.

Sponsorship: verifying paymaster: the paymaster pays and no token is charged grade: observed

Money

Outer receipt fee (bundler → chain)

0.006329 AVAX

gas used × effective gas price, paid once

Σ actualGasCost (deposits → beneficiary)

0.006576 AVAX

1 operation charge

The outer fee (what the bundler paid the network) and the per-op charges (what the EntryPoint collected from deposits and paid to the beneficiary) are different quantities. They are listed, never added together; their difference is not 'bundler profit'.

The logs

Receipt logs (10), in order, with the lifecycle phase each belongs to
#	Emitter	Event	Phase
0	`0x9d0f…e5ec` evidence level: unlabelled	`RootValidatorUpdated(bytes21)`	validation
1	`0x7ab1…9e69` evidence level: unlabelled	`WebAuthnRegistered(address,uint256,uint256)`	validation
2	`0x9d0f…e5ec` evidence level: unlabelled	`ModuleInstalled(uint256,address)`	validation
3	`0x0000…a032` EntryPoint v0.7 evidence level: primary source	`AccountDeployed`	validation
4	`0x7777…834c` Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.7) evidence level: primary source	`UserOperationSponsored`	validation
5	`0x0000…a032` EntryPoint v0.7 evidence level: primary source	`BeforeExecution`	boundary
6	`0x845a…ce57` evidence level: unlabelled	`OwnerRegistered(address,address)`	execution
7	`0x9d0f…e5ec` evidence level: unlabelled	`ModuleInstalled(uint256,address)`	execution
8	`0x9d0f…e5ec` evidence level: unlabelled	`SelectorSet(bytes4,bytes21,bool)`	execution
9	`0x0000…a032` EntryPoint v0.7 evidence level: primary source	`UserOperationEvent`	execution

What we can't tell

The signer is a passkey (a P-256 public key held by a device or password manager); there is no address to look up, and the key does not tell you who holds the device.
A paymaster paid the gas charge, but that does not mean the user paid nothing: the paymaster may bill the user off-chain or in a token (see sponsorship mode).
The beneficiary is only where gas compensation was sent; it is not the user, and it is not proof of who runs the bundler.
UserOp success=true only means the account's call did not revert at the top level. Accounts and batch executors can catch inner failures, so individual legs can still have failed.
Some contracts involved are unlabelled: event and function names shown for them are signature-database hints and do not identify the app or protocol.
Names (token symbols, labels) are metadata unless their evidence level says otherwise.
The outer fee is what the bundler paid the network for the whole transaction; it cannot be split fairly across ops or legs, and comparing it with the per-op charges does not give bundler profit.

Rendered from the explain record (schema epi.explain/v1). Address labels and levels come from the current registry. How evidence grades and levels work →