EntryPoint IntelligenceERC-4337 on Avalanche C-Chain Data to 2026-10-25

Examples v06-empty-call-monitoring

v06-empty-call-monitoring

v0.6 succeeded 1 operation

Bundler 0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint submitted one v0.6 UserOperation: account 0x3455…1119 Scheduled zero-call account A (v0.6) evidence level: cluster asked to an empty, zero-value call to the zero address (does nothing visible); the op succeeded; gas sponsored by 0x6666…c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source.

Transaction
0x205b550f8cf4462ca048872d6b5df61b1e841d5b2f050657e11f7affd6339049 explained →
Block
97,835,560
Outer status
success grade: observed
UserOperations
1 in 1 handleOps call
Selector
0x1fad948c
How to read the evidence markers

Evidence levels (how strong an address label is)

  • evidence level: primary source The vendor or protocol itself publishes this exact address
  • evidence level: self-description What the contract says about itself via a getter; contracts can claim any name
  • evidence level: cluster Shares a key, getter or bytecode with labelled addresses: same machinery, not proof of the same operator
  • evidence level: hint Ranking, explorer tag, metadata or third-party label: a clue, never proof
  • evidence level: unlabelled No registry label. In running text, an address without a marker has no label.

Evidence grades (how a value was obtained), strongest first

grade: observed grade: decoded grade: recomputed grade: recovered grade: contract read grade: inferred grade: unknown

Weaker grades are set in italics. Hover or focus a marker for its definition; full definitions.

Who was involved

Bundler
0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint
sent and paid for the outer transaction · grade: observed
Called contract
0x5ff1…2789 EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary source
grade: observed
EntryPoint
0x5ff1…2789 EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary source
v0.6 handleOps · grade: decoded
Beneficiary
0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint
the beneficiary argument of handleOps · same address as the bundler · grade: decoded

Operations: what was asked, what happened

Operation 1

v0.6 succeeded index 0

Account 0x3455…1119 Scheduled zero-call account A (v0.6) evidence level: cluster asked to an empty, zero-value call to the zero address (does nothing visible); the op succeeded; gas sponsored by 0x6666…c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source.

Who was involved

Smart account
0x3455…1119 Scheduled zero-call account A (v0.6) evidence level: cluster
the sender field of UserOperationEvent · grade: observed
Account code
0x8abb…136c SimpleAccountFactory v0.6 (eth-infinitism reference) account implementation (per accountImplementation()) evidence level: cluster
contract code and storage read at block 97835560 · EIP-1967 proxy · grade: contract read
Paymaster
0x6666…c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source
the operation's paymasterAndData field · grade: decoded
Signer key
0x8fd3…7a03 Signer key of scheduled workload cluster A evidence level: cluster
signature scheme personal_sign(userOpHash), an EOA (secp256k1) key; matches the on-chain owner getter owner()=0x8fd379246834eac74b8419ffda202cf8051f7a03 evidence level: cluster at block 97835560. A key, not a person. · grade: contract read

What was asked

Entry function on the account: execute(address,uint256,bytes) grade: decoded

  1. Call 1 an empty, zero-value call to the zero address (does nothing visible)

    target 0x0000…0000 evidence level: unlabelled · function grade: unknown · via the account's execute function

What happened

The outer transaction reported success grade: observed; this UserOperation succeeded grade: observed.

  • Call 1 not visible in the receipt grade: unknowncalls without calldata emit no logs; the receipt cannot show whether it ran

Money for this operation

The EntryPoint charged this operation 0.000850 AVAX (actualGasCost) grade: observed, taken from paymaster deposit 0x6666666666667849c56f2850848ce1c4da65c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source grade: inferred and paid to the beneficiary grade: inferred.

Sponsorship: verifying paymaster: the paymaster pays and no token is charged grade: observed

Money

Outer receipt fee (bundler → chain)
0.001269 AVAX
gas used × effective gas price, paid once
Σ actualGasCost (deposits → beneficiary)
0.000850 AVAX
1 operation charge

The outer fee (what the bundler paid the network) and the per-op charges (what the EntryPoint collected from deposits and paid to the beneficiary) are different quantities. They are listed, never added together; their difference is not 'bundler profit'.

The logs

Receipt logs (3), in order, with the lifecycle phase each belongs to
#EmitterEventPhase
00x6666…c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary sourceUserOperationSponsoredvalidation
10x5ff1…2789 EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary sourceBeforeExecutionboundary
20x5ff1…2789 EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary sourceUserOperationEventexecution

What we can't tell

  • The signer is a key (address) recovered from the signature. It does not tell you which person, company or bot controls that key.
  • A paymaster paid the gas charge, but that does not mean the user paid nothing: the paymaster may bill the user off-chain or in a token (see sponsorship mode).
  • The beneficiary is only where gas compensation was sent; it is not the user, and it is not proof of who runs the bundler.
  • UserOp success=true only means the account's call did not revert at the top level. Accounts and batch executors can catch inner failures, so individual legs can still have failed.
  • Some requested calls leave no log, so the receipt alone cannot show whether they ran or what they changed (a trace, --trace, can show whether they were reached).
  • Names (token symbols, labels) are metadata unless their evidence level says otherwise.
  • The outer fee is what the bundler paid the network for the whole transaction; it cannot be split fairly across ops or legs, and comparing it with the per-op charges does not give bundler profit.

Rendered from the explain record (schema epi.explain/v1). Address labels and levels come from the current registry. How evidence grades and levels work →