v06-bundle-two-accounts · EntryPoint Intelligence

Bundler 0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint submitted a bundle of 2 v0.6 UserOperations for 2 smart account(s), requesting call x2 across 1 target contract(s); 2 of 2 succeeded.

Transaction: 0xfff9a920901823e8f6f2cca4ac9daf7d386cc95027af190cb9603c8ffef0475f explained →
Block: 97,861,615
Outer status: success grade: observed
UserOperations: 2 in 1 handleOps call
Selector: 0x1fad948c

How to read the evidence markers

Evidence levels (how strong an address label is)

evidence level: primary source The vendor or protocol itself publishes this exact address
evidence level: self-description What the contract says about itself via a getter; contracts can claim any name
evidence level: cluster Shares a key, getter or bytecode with labelled addresses: same machinery, not proof of the same operator
evidence level: hint Ranking, explorer tag, metadata or third-party label: a clue, never proof
evidence level: unlabelled No registry label. In running text, an address without a marker has no label.

Evidence grades (how a value was obtained), strongest first

grade: observed grade: decoded grade: recomputed grade: recovered grade: contract read grade: inferred grade: unknown

Weaker grades are set in italics. Hover or focus a marker for its definition; full definitions.

Who was involved

Bundler: 0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint
sent and paid for the outer transaction · grade: observed
Called contract: 0x5ff1…2789 EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary source
grade: observed
EntryPoint: 0x5ff1…2789 EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary source
v0.6 handleOps · grade: decoded
Beneficiary: 0x4337…8d0e Unattributed bundler #6 (EOA) evidence level: hint
the beneficiary argument of handleOps · same address as the bundler · grade: decoded

Operations: what was asked, what happened

Operation 1 of 2

v0.6 succeeded index 0

Account 0x1b9b…354d asked to call selector 0x4b268241 on 0x5bbb…603a Collateral coordinator (application unattributed) evidence level: hint (function unknown); the op succeeded; gas sponsored by 0x6666…c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source.

Who was involved

Smart account: 0x1b9b…354d evidence level: unlabelled
the sender field of UserOperationEvent · grade: observed
Account code: 0xd3f5…40ab ZeroDev Kernel v0.2.3 implementation evidence level: primary source
contract code and storage read at block 97861615 · EIP-1967 proxy · grade: contract read
Paymaster: 0x6666…c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source
the operation's paymasterAndData field · grade: decoded
Signer key: 0x7ff3…a2d2 evidence level: unlabelled
signature scheme raw ECDSA(userOpHash), an EOA (secp256k1) key; matches the on-chain owner getter Kernel v2 ECDSAValidator.ecdsaValidatorStorage=0x7ff34491562acc6d3072805e11fde73fa1e8a2d2 at block 97861615. A key, not a person. · grade: contract read

What was asked

Entry function on the account: execute(address,uint256,bytes,uint8) grade: decoded

Call 1 call selector 0x4b268241 on 0x5bbb…603a Collateral coordinator (application unattributed) evidence level: hint (function unknown)
target 0x5bbb…603a Collateral coordinator (application unattributed) evidence level: hint · function 0x4b268241 grade: unknown · via the account's execute function

What happened

The outer transaction reported success grade: observed; this UserOperation succeeded grade: observed.

Call 1 ran (its logs show it) grade: inferredthe target emitted 1 log(s) in this op's execution segment (Withdrawal(address,address,address,uint256) x1); this shows it ran, not what it achieved

Token movements logged during this operation:

ERC-20 transfer of 1.800000 USDt 0x9702…a8c7 USDt (native, Tether) evidence level: primary source from 0xe271…ada9 to 0xb205…0159 between other addresses, during execution grade: observed

Money for this operation

The EntryPoint charged this operation 0.002106 AVAX (actualGasCost) grade: observed, taken from paymaster deposit 0x6666666666667849c56f2850848ce1c4da65c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source grade: inferred and paid to the beneficiary grade: inferred.

Sponsorship: verifying paymaster: the paymaster pays and no token is charged grade: observed

Operation 2 of 2

v0.6 succeeded index 1

Account 0x1f83…f27c asked to call selector 0x4b268241 on 0x5bbb…603a Collateral coordinator (application unattributed) evidence level: hint (function unknown); the op succeeded; gas sponsored by 0x6666…c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source.

Who was involved

Smart account: 0x1f83…f27c evidence level: unlabelled
the sender field of UserOperationEvent · grade: observed
Account code: 0xd3f5…40ab ZeroDev Kernel v0.2.3 implementation evidence level: primary source
contract code and storage read at block 97861615 · EIP-1967 proxy · grade: contract read
Paymaster: 0x6666…c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source
the operation's paymasterAndData field · grade: decoded
Signer key: 0x356d…1728 evidence level: unlabelled
signature scheme raw ECDSA(userOpHash), an EOA (secp256k1) key; matches the on-chain owner getter Kernel v2 ECDSAValidator.ecdsaValidatorStorage=0x356d9a7065e5fed0657e79dab20040e035251728 at block 97861615. A key, not a person. · grade: contract read

What was asked

Entry function on the account: execute(address,uint256,bytes,uint8) grade: decoded

Call 1 call selector 0x4b268241 on 0x5bbb…603a Collateral coordinator (application unattributed) evidence level: hint (function unknown)
target 0x5bbb…603a Collateral coordinator (application unattributed) evidence level: hint · function 0x4b268241 grade: unknown · via the account's execute function

What happened

The outer transaction reported success grade: observed; this UserOperation succeeded grade: observed.

Call 1 ran (its logs show it) grade: inferredthe target emitted 1 log(s) in this op's execution segment (Withdrawal(address,address,address,uint256) x1); this shows it ran, not what it achieved

Token movements logged during this operation:

ERC-20 transfer of 1.400000 USDt 0x9702…a8c7 USDt (native, Tether) evidence level: primary source from 0x5490…2c8c to 0x5189…a9ac between other addresses, during execution grade: observed

Money for this operation

The EntryPoint charged this operation 0.001778 AVAX (actualGasCost) grade: observed, taken from paymaster deposit 0x6666666666667849c56f2850848ce1c4da65c68b Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source grade: inferred and paid to the beneficiary grade: inferred.

Sponsorship: verifying paymaster: the paymaster pays and no token is charged grade: observed

Money

Outer receipt fee (bundler → chain)

0.005025 AVAX

gas used × effective gas price, paid once

Σ actualGasCost (deposits → beneficiary)

0.003883 AVAX

2 operation charges

The outer fee (what the bundler paid the network) and the per-op charges (what the EntryPoint collected from deposits and paid to the beneficiary) are different quantities. They are listed, never added together; their difference is not 'bundler profit'.

The logs

Receipt logs (9), in order, with the lifecycle phase each belongs to
#	Emitter	Event	Phase
0	`0x6666…c68b` Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source	`UserOperationSponsored`	validation
1	`0x6666…c68b` Pimlico singleton paymaster (EntryPoint v0.6) evidence level: primary source	`UserOperationSponsored`	validation
2	`0x5ff1…2789` EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary source	`BeforeExecution`	boundary
3	`0x9702…a8c7` USDt (native, Tether) evidence level: primary source	`Transfer`	execution
4	`0x5bbb…603a` Collateral coordinator (application unattributed) evidence level: hint	`Withdrawal(address,address,address,uint256)`	execution
5	`0x5ff1…2789` EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary source	`UserOperationEvent`	execution
6	`0x9702…a8c7` USDt (native, Tether) evidence level: primary source	`Transfer`	execution
7	`0x5bbb…603a` Collateral coordinator (application unattributed) evidence level: hint	`Withdrawal(address,address,address,uint256)`	execution
8	`0x5ff1…2789` EntryPoint v0.6 evidence level: primary source	`UserOperationEvent`	execution

What we can't tell

The signer is a key (address) recovered from the signature. It does not tell you which person, company or bot controls that key.
A paymaster paid the gas charge, but that does not mean the user paid nothing: the paymaster may bill the user off-chain or in a token (see sponsorship mode).
The beneficiary is only where gas compensation was sent; it is not the user, and it is not proof of who runs the bundler.
UserOp success=true only means the account's call did not revert at the top level. Accounts and batch executors can catch inner failures, so individual legs can still have failed.
Some labels are only at 'hint' or 'cluster' level; treat them as leads, not identity.
Token transfers between other addresses inside this op's segment were caused during its execution, but the receipt does not say who economically benefited.
Names (token symbols, labels) are metadata unless their evidence level says otherwise.
The outer fee is what the bundler paid the network for the whole transaction; it cannot be split fairly across ops or legs, and comparing it with the per-op charges does not give bundler profit.

Rendered from the explain record (schema epi.explain/v1). Address labels and levels come from the current registry. How evidence grades and levels work →